Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of the Township v. Hackensack Improvement Commission

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 28, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stevens, V. C.. The complainant alleges in its bill that it is indebted- to- one Burke, who has recovered judgment against it for $1,167.54, *230and that the boroughs which were set oif from complainant after the liability was incurred, are liable in equity to contribute to the payment of this judgment. The claim cannot be sustained. There is no contract to pay alleged; there is no implied assumpsit; for the money paid by Burke was paid by him for the use of the complainant, before the defendants had come into existence. And the'claim is not grounded on any principle of justice which has been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Inhabitants of Orvil v. Mayor of WoodcliffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cartan v. PhelpsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  2. Solatinow v. Jersey City, Hoboken & Paterson Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API