Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Leonard G. Tillman v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility Robert L. Raiger, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 10, 2000No. 99-3656Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRendell, Circuit Judge

In his pro se complaint, Tillman, a state prisoner, alleges that the Lebanon County prison took half of the money in his wallet, as well as half of the money orders sent to him, to pay the balance of a daily $10 charge incurred during an earlier prison sentence. The prison took this money pursuant to a policy adopted by the Lebanon County Prison Board. Tillman states, “I sign [sic] no agreement or contracts to have them take my money.” His counseled brief on appeal similarly attacks the prison’s basis for taking his money, stating that “no court, nor any statute, authorizes the imposition of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. In the Interest of M.W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. HarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. United States v. Taiwo Adeshola AkandeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. Cassell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API