Legal Opinion

Nally v. Howell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1997No. S97A0201PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

Following a contractual dispute between Paul Nally and Bennett Motor Express (“Bennett”), Nally met with Judge Shepherd Howell and presented him with an application for a criminal warrant, asserting Bennett and its executive officers had committed the ofíense of theft by taking. Judge Howell declined to issue a warrant, taking the position that the dispute should be pursued civilly, not criminally. Because Nally could not appeal in the absence of a written order, Nally filed a petition for mandamus to compel Judge Howell to render his refusal to issue a warrant in writing.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chisholm v. CoferSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Jersawitz v. BodifordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McRae v. PadgettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API