Legal Opinion

City of Rome v. Pilgrim

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1980No. 36192; 36193PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

Following the denial of his rezoning requests before the Rome Planning Commission and the Rome City Commission, the appellee, *282A. C. Pilgrim, brought this suit in the Superior Court of Floyd County to have a single-family residential zoning ordinance (R-1A) declared unconstitutional as applied to his property.

The subject property consists of two lots purchased by the appellee at an auction in 1974. The two lots, which have always been vacant, are in a residential subdivision known as College Heights. The northern boundaries of the two lots border Shorter Avenue, which is the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Guhl v. Holcomb Bridge Road Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Toomey v. Norwood Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. WMM Properties, Inc. v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Cannon v. Coweta CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  3. Kammerer Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. Forsyth County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Cannon v. Coweta CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. KAMMERER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC v. FORSYTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API