Legal Opinion

Foerch v. Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 29, 1974No. Nos. 74-27, 74-28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHAN, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals an adverse summary final judgment in her action against Atlantic Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Hartnett Insurance Agency and Langley Insurance Agency to recover on an insurance claim growing out of a fire at her Golden Beach, Florida, home.

The policy sold to appellant by Hartnett and Langley, and issued by Atlantic Mutual, contained two pertinent clauses: “. . . this company shall not be liable for loss occurring (b) while a described building, whether intended for occupancy by owner or tenant, is vacant or unoccupied beyond a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quintana v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Aetna Insurance Co. v. SettembrinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Foerch v. Atlantic Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API