Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nash v. Nash

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1945No. 29488Published

1DissentMallery, J.

(dissenting) — The respondent secured a decree of divorce from the appellant by default. The findings of fact upon which the decree was based found that the appellant was an able-bodied man, employed in the shipyards at seventy dollars per week. The decree gave the respondent custody of the minor child and allowed twenty dollars per week for his support. Appellant’s petition for modification of the decree showed that, for some time prior to its filing, appellant was employed by the United States Army Transport at a salary of about one hundred and fifteen dollars per month.

Appellant had the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ætna Insurance v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. O'Bryan v. American Investment & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Kawabe v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Pappas v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API