Legal Opinion

State v. Costales

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1933No. 3818PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudspeth, J.

The appellant, Albino Costales, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted in the district court of Bernalillo county of the crime of assault with intent to kill, and, from the judgment and sentence to a term in the penitentiary, he appeals.

The following statement of the facts appears in appellant’s brief: »

“On the 19th day of November, 1931, Charlie N. Burgin was working as a stationary fireman in the powerhouse at the Santa Fé Shops in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and had been working at said shops for more than nine years, and was acquainted with the defendant, Albino Costales, who on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. People v. KasemMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Colbert v. Journal Publishing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. BorchertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State v. McFallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. EscamillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API