Legal Opinion
Martin Gillen v. Nethanjah Breitnebach
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 4, 2026No. 3:26-cv-00243Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 MARTIN GILLEN, Case No. 3:26-cv-00243-MMD-CSD 7 Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 NETHANJAH BREITNEBACH,1 9 Respondent. 10 11 Petitioner Martin Gillen, a pro se Nevada prisoner, commenced this action by filing 12 a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1 (“Petition”)). The Court instructed Gillen 13 to resolve the filing fee, and he timely complied. (ECF No. 5-9.) Gillen has not filed his 14 Petition on the appropriate form; however, he is in substantial compliance, and his Petition 15 is legible. See Rule 2(d) of the Rules…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Edgar M. Hendricks v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Howard L. Bashor v. Henry Risley, Warden of Montana State Prison and Michael Greely, Attorney General for the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.