Underhill v. McManus
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 218, July T., 1895, by garnishees, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1894, No. 154, making absolute a rule for judgment against garnishees. Rule for judgment against garnishees.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 218, July T., 1895, by garnishees, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1894, No. 154, making absolute a rule for judgment against garnishees. Rule for judgment against garnishees. It was agreed by the parties that Stephen Underbill had issued an attachment under the act of March 17, 1869, against the defendant, Philip McManus, on the 10th day of September, 1894, and had lodged the writ with the sheriff of Philadelphia county, on the same day at 10:30 o’clock; that the sheriff had served the said writ of attachment upon Nice & Schreiber, the garnishees above named, on…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
There appears to be no error in this record. The questions presented by the assignments of error were fully considered and correctly decided by the learned judge of the common pleas; and on his clear and satisfactory opinion the judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Rice v. WalinsziusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900