Legal Opinion

Taylor's Administratrix v. District of Columbia

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 19, 1884No. 100Published

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The facts found in this case differ but little from those in numerous cases which have been before the court. An abstract of them will be found in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Drake, Oh. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant’s intestate, Jonathan Taylor, was the owner of five certificates issued by the auditor of the Board of Public Works of the District of Columbia to one L. S. Filbert, as evidence of money due from that board for work done by Filbert, under contracts with the board.

Each of the certificates was endorsed by Filbert, and made payable to the order of Jonathan Taylor; who endorsed them *556in blank, and delivered them to one Blumenberg as collateral security for money borrowed by Taylor from Blumenberg.

All of said certificates were presented,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. North American Neuchatel Rock Paving Co. v. District of ColumbiaUnited States Court of Claims · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API