Legal Opinion
Keating v. Boyce Machinery Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 1967No. 6940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOTTINGER, Judge.
This is a suit for the recovery of damages to machinery. The record shows that in November of 1964, R. T. Keating, plaintiff, *624who was at that time in the dozer business, contacted Boyce Machinery Corp., defendant, because he was having trouble with one of his bulldozers. The defendant sent one of its mechanics to the plaintiff’s place of business to investigate the trouble. The difficulty was with a hydraulic pump on one of the bulldozers, (hereafter referred to as hydraulic dozer). In order to make the repair, it was necessary to remove the pump and take it in to the shop.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hayward v. CarrawayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Lambert v. American Box Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Maryland Casualty Company v. RittinerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Palmetto Moss Factory v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coleman v. VictorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Williams v. Louisiana MacHinery Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Darnell v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Taylor v. Allstate Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967