Legal Opinion
Sperl v. Deukmejian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 23, 1981No. 79-3810PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
642 F.2d 1154
Timothy SPERL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
George DEUKMEJIAN, in his capacity as Attorney General for
the State of California; and John Van De Kamp, in
his capacity as District Attorney for
the County of Los Angeles,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 79-3810.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1981.
Decided March 23, 1981.
Donald M. Re, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.
Jan A. Pluim, John H. Larson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before TANG, SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- James D. Booker v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- James K. Shannon, A/K/A James K. Kelly v. Sheriff Sequeechi, Sheriff Lloyd Beair, and Sheriff Bill LessmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Augustine v. NevesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007