Legal Opinion

Wm. Franz & Co v. Fink

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1909No. 4601Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Division “D,”

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Alleging that on or about the 13th day of March, 1906, and again op or about the 4th day of April, 1906, It delivered to one Louis Moss “for temporary use” certain’described earrings valued at the sum of $1,477.97; that it “did mot sell the said earrings nor either of them to the said Moss .nor # * * par^ -^h the ownership thereof in whole or in part,-nor * * * authorize the said Moss to sell or dispose of the said earnings in whole or in part or either of them, nor do ’ pledge, pawn or encumber the same in any manner, shape -or form; and that, nevertheless, the said Moss “did pawn and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. . ClewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Crocker v. GulliferSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  3. Estate of McGovranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Holbrook v. ArmstrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1833
  5. Dearborn v. TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API