Legal Opinion

United States v. Adams

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2009No. 08-5261UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Loren Adams was convicted of three counts of transportation of obscene matter by United States mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1461 (2006), and three counts of transportation of obscene matter for sale or distribution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1465 (2006). He received a sentence of thirty-three months’ imprisonment.

On appeal, Adams first contends that he is entitled to a new trial, as the jury failed to consider the charged material “as a whole,” as required by Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973). Therefore, according to Adams, the Government failed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard GobernCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. StaglianoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. United States v. Stagliano, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API