Legal Opinion
State v. Pacheco
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 29, 2007No. 24,154PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Defendant was convicted of three counts of criminal sexual penetration of a minor (CSPM) and appeals. In a previous decision, we reversed on grounds that the presence of an interpreter during jury deliberations was unauthorized. State v. Pacheco, 2006-NMCA-002, ¶¶ 18, 21, 138 N.M. 737, 126 P.3d 553. The Supreme Court subsequently reversed that decision, and remanded the case to this Court to consider the remaining issues raised by Defendant. State v. Pacheco, 2007-NMSC-009, ¶ 36, 141 N.M. 340, 155 P.3d 745. Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor made an impermissible…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. FarmerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.