People v. Williams
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Crockett, J.:
The. defendant having been found guilty of grand larceny, moved to arrest the judgment, on the ground that the indictment does not charge the commission of a felony, and is insufficient. The Court arrested the judgment, and the prosecution has appealed.
The indictment charges that the defendant “did unlawfully and feloniously take, steal, and carry away from the mining claim of the Brush Creek Gold and Silver Mining Company—a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of California—fifty-two pounds of gold-bearing quartz rock, the personal goods of the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. OpieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. BrunwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.