Legal Opinion

In re Donohue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1971. He resides in the City of Albany.

*1213By decision dated September 6, 2000, this Court suspended respondent from practice indefinitely for mental incapacity. Our decision stated that respondent could apply for reinstatement when he could demonstrate that he is no longer incapacitated from practicing law (Matter of Donohue, 275 AD2d 803 [2000]).

Respondent has submitted medical opinion that he is no longer incapacitated from practicing law. He has also moved for leave to now file the required affidavit of compliance with the suspension order,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of KeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API