Holland v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
John A. Fogleman,
dissenting. Were we construing Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1709 (Repl. 1964) for the first time, I would have no quarrel with the result reached by the majority. This section was a part of the Revised Statutes adopted in March 1838. It has survived four changes of constitutions, a complete codification of the code of criminal procedure, one extensive reform of criminal procedure by initiated act and legislative sessions too numerous to count without a word change. While the construction of the words involved in this case was originally made in a case involving the companion statute…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Dillard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- O'Daniel v. the Brunswick Balke Collender CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Beckwith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.