Legal Opinion · Dissent

Holland v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 29, 1972No. 5718Published

1Dissent

John A. Fogleman,

dissenting. Were we construing Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1709 (Repl. 1964) for the first time, I would have no quarrel with the result reached by the majority. This section was a part of the Revised Statutes adopted in March 1838. It has survived four changes of constitutions, a complete codification of the code of criminal procedure, one extensive reform of criminal procedure by initiated act and legislative sessions too numerous to count without a word change. While the construction of the words involved in this case was originally made in a case involving the companion statute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Dillard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  3. Fox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. O'Daniel v. the Brunswick Balke Collender CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  5. Beckwith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API