Legal Opinion
Mah Toi v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., as Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1955No. 13563_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLDT, District Judge.
Appellant seeks to establish that he is a citizen of the United States, proceeding under 8 U.S.C. § 903 * and basing his claim to such status on the allegation that he was born in the City of San Francisco, California on November 1, 1902 and by reason of native birth is a citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution. The only evidence offered at the trial in support of appellant's petition was the personal testimony of appellant and the admission in evidence of the judgment roll in Cause No. 14,143 of the California Superior Court for San Francisco…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fontes v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Otis & Co. v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Maurice v. WoodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers Ass'n v. Neustadter Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Paula Arguello De Vargas v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Lee Hon Lung v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Joseph Evans, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Wallace M. Handeland and Lee Handeland v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Medina Cardona v. PonsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.