Legal Opinion

Blethen v. Blethen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1934No. 24894. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb, J. —

Such proceedings were had in the above entitled case as resulted in an interlocutory decree of divorce on July 11, 1930, which decree was made final on January 26, 1931.

During the pendency of the action, the parties entered into a stipulation for a property settlement contingent upon a divorce being granted, the terms of which settlement were embodied in the decree. It provided for the payment of permanent alimony to appellant of one hundred fifty dollars per month, which was to be increased under certain contingencies, as to which provisions jurisdiction was not retained by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ruge v. RugeWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bedolfe v. BedolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Springstun v. SpringstunWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Cooper v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Kinne v. KinneWashington Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eaton v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Fisch v. MarlerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Duncan v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Starkey v. StarkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. State Ex Rel. Weingart v. KiessenbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API