Legal Opinion

Knobel v. Manuche

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*321OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin B. Stecher, J.

This action for breach of contract was previously tried without a jury and by decision dated November 21, 1986, I determined that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover on his contract. However, at the end of the plaintiff’s case he moved to amend his pleadings to conform to the proof (CPLR 3025 [c]) by inserting in the complaint a cause of action for quantum meruit. The motion to amend the complaint during trial was denied; for, to confront the defendant with a new, unpleaded cause of action, at that stage was to take the defendant by surprise, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Rusciano Realty Services, Ltd. v. GrifflerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Jontow v. JontowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Abinet v. MediavillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knobel v. ManucheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API