Legal Opinion

Gooden v. Moses Bros.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Montgomery. Tried before the Hon. John R. Tyson.

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

This suit is for the breach of a contract, the substance of which, so far as necessary to recite it, wa3 that the defendants, Moses Bros., agreed to sell to the plaintiff, Carrie Gooden, a certain lot of land in the city of Montgomery, at the price of $622.50, one hundred and fifty dollars of which plaintiff was to pay, and did pay in cash, *231and tbe balance was to be paid in monthly instalments of $15.00 each, with interest; and defendants, on the full payment of the purchase-money, were to give to plaintiff a warranty deed to the property. The contract contained the provision, also, that if…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strauss v. MeertiefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Culver v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  4. Thorp v. BradleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Rose's Executors v. BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Anderson v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Avalon Construction Corp. v. Kirch Holding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. The Industrial Development Board of the Town of Section, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., the Industrial Development Board of the City of Fort Payne, Alabama v. Fuqua Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Walker County v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API