Legal Opinion
Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 16, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01969Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 A hearings officer of the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency approved George and Virginia 18 | Johannessen’s proposal to build a pier on their lakefront residential lot. Michael Harrosh, the 19 | Johannessens’ neighbor, opposed their proposal. He appealed the hearings officer’s decision, and 20 | the Agency’s governing board rejected Harrosh’s appeal in an eleven-to-zero vote.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.