Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Camden & Philadelphia Ferry Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

In April, 1877, the plaintiff drove his horses and carriage upon the defendants’ ferry boat, at Philadelphia, for the purpose of crossing over to Camden. Before the boat left the slip, the horses became frightened, and ran over the bow of the boat into the river. The horses were drowned, and the carriage and harness damaged. This action is brought to recover compensation for the loss.

A ferryman is not chargeable as a common carrier, for the *26absolute safety of property regained by a passenger in his own custody and under his own control.

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wyckoff v. . Queens County Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Edson v. WestonNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Clark v. . Union Ferry CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Draney v. BachmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  2. Capezzaro v. WinfreyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. Kandret v. MasonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. WORLD EXPRESS & CONNECTION, INC. v. CROCUS INVESTMENTS, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API