Legal Opinion

McLennan & Hill Counties Tehuacana Creek Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1964No. 4241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Defendant district appeals from a temporary injunction restraining it from going on plaintiffs’ land or constructing or maintaining thereon any structure in connection with a dam or emergency spillway.

The petition upon which the writ was granted alleged that an easement was executed by plaintiffs which authorized defendant district to use plaintiffs’ land “For and in connection with the construction, alteration, operation and inspection of the following described works of improvement to be located on the above described land; for the flowage of any waters in, over, upon or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Camp v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Southwest Weather Research, Inc. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. Employers Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Young v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Upshur Rural Electric Cooperative Corp. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Clark v. El Paso Cablevision, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Sobel v. City of Lacy LakeviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API