Legal Opinion

Naef v. Miller-Goll Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 27, 1933No. 31804PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

The only question involved in this appeal is whether the amount allowed by the trial court as fee for counsel and expenses is excessive.

The rule which this court follows for fixing fees of attorneys is to ascertain as nearly as possible the value of the services rendered and to fix the fees accordingly. In estimating the value of services rendered by attorneys in any case, we take into consideration the responsibility incurred, which involves a consideration of the importance of the litigation, as well as the amount involved, the extent and character of the labor performed, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peltier v. ThibodauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baruch v. GiblenSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Peiser v. Grand Isle, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Henriques v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Peiser v. Grand Isle, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API