Green v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The indictment contains two count's, the first of which charges appellant with forgery of the following instrument, set out according to its tenor:
“2/16 1911
let Boy Denman
have 685 (meaning thereby $6.85) L. T. Burns.”
The second count charges appellant with passing to H. C. Goebel as true the said forged instrument, knowing it to be a forgery, etc.
The indictment is attacked on demurrer because it does not set out an instrument upon which forgery can be assigned, and again, that it is an instrument with no legal force or efficacy whatever, and that the indictment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Forcy, Alias Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Acuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Rouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Rummel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974