Legal Opinion

Watkins v. City of Mobile

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 28, 1989No. 1 Div. 854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, Judge.

Neil Watkins was convicted of assault in the third degree in violation of a city ordinance. See Alabama Code 1975, § 13A-6-22. He was sentenced to ten days in the city jail and ordered to pay $180.50 in restitution. Watkins, a bail bondsman, claims that he cannot be guilty of assault because he was performing his duties legally and within the letter of the law. In a case of first impression in this state, we hold that under Alabama law, a surety or bail bondsman may only delegate his authority to arrest the principal by a written endorsement on a certified copy of the bail…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Livingston v. BrowderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Gray v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Shine v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Register v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Nicholson v. KillpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O.K. Bonding Co., Inc. v. MiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API