Legal Opinion
Redmond v. Shook
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 11, 1995No. A95A1769PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Chief Judge.
This is a medical malpractice action instituted by Redmond against Shook one day prior to expiration of the statute of limitation. Shook moved for summary judgment on the ground that Redmond failed to comply with the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-9.1. Shook stated as undisputed material fact that the document purporting to be the expert affidavit filed with Redmond’s complaint was signed by the expert in Pennsylvania and notarized by the notary public in Georgia, and that the oath was administered by the notary to the expert over the telephone. Redmond appeals the trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- 0-1 Doctors Memorial Holding Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Carnes v. CarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Harvey v. Kidney Center of Central Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schmidt v. FeldmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Roberson v. Ocwen Federal Bank FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Sambor v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- S K Hand Tool Corp. v. LowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- S K Hand Tool Corp. v. LowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996