Legal Opinion

Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1930No. 29,392PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff obtained judgment for a freight overcharge on a carload of beans shipped from Fort Morgan, Colo., to Safford, Ariz., and the defendant appeals.

The evidence consisted largely of an agreed statement of facts, as follows:

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the plaintiff, and defendant in the above-entitled cause, by and through their respective attorneys, that the following facts are true and that the proof thereof other than by this stipulation is hereby waived:
“1. That the plaintiff is a corporation duly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Kellogg Huff Grain Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Hodgson-Cauthorn Grain Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API