Legal Opinion
Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 7, 1930No. 29,392PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The plaintiff obtained judgment for a freight overcharge on a carload of beans shipped from Fort Morgan, Colo., to Safford, Ariz., and the defendant appeals.
The evidence consisted largely of an agreed statement of facts, as follows:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the plaintiff, and defendant in the above-entitled cause, by and through their respective attorneys, that the following facts are true and that the proof thereof other than by this stipulation is hereby waived:
“1. That the plaintiff is a corporation duly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. Chicago Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Kellogg Huff Grain Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fort Morgan Bean Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Hodgson-Cauthorn Grain Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930