Knight v. Maaco Auto Body and Paint
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BOBBY J. KNIGHT, JR. PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:20-cv-00186-KGB MAACO AUTO BODY AND PAINT, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is defendants Maaco Auto Body and Paint (“Maaco”) and Bill Lytle’s (collectively “defendants”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiff Bobby J. Knight, Jr. filed suit pro se in this matter asserting claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) (Dkt. No. 2). Mr. Knight has not filed a response to defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Brian Ulrich v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Deborah L. Schoffstall v. William Henderson, Agent U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Clegg v. Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Humphreys v. Medical Towers, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.