Legal Opinion

Smeaton v. Fidelity National Title

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1999No. C028795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NICHOLSON, J.

Tony Smeaton appeals from a judgment following a bench trial in favor of defendant Fidelity National Title in this lawsuit founded upon a title insurance policy. The court found the statute of limitations barred any recovery. On appeal, Smeaton contends the limitations period for claims founded upon a title insurance policy cannot begin to run until the policy is issued. We agree and reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Smeaton retained Fidelity to handle the escrow and title insurance in connection with his purchase of approximately 693 acres of real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. 65 Butterfield v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Tabachnick v. Ticor Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Ward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API