Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. Town of Webster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed *991without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Xerox Corporation (Xerox) commenced this action under 42 USC § 1983 seeking relief from alleged civil rights violations in connection with tax assessments levied upon property owned by Xerox. Contrary to defendants’ contention, the 1987 settlement agreement between the parties does not bar Xerox’s section 1983 action. The settlement agreement by its unambiguous terms was "made only for the purpose of resolving pending litigation”. The section 1983 action was not pending at the time the agreement was entered into, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emunim v. Town of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Morgulas v. J. Yudell Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. MacMaster v. SardinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Ouimet v. OuimetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zen Center of Syracuse, Inc. v. GamageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. ZEN CENTER OF SYRACUSE, INC. v. GAMAGE, JOHN C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API