Legal Opinion

Calkins v. Stevens

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bronson, Ch. J.

In a police court, plaintiff sued defendant to recover $200 due for rent. Garnishment proceedings were also instituted. The garnishees, who had purchased a certain pool hall outfit from defendant, disclosed $200 due. The appellant herein, claiming a right to the money through a chattel mortgage upon the outfit, was permitted to intervene. After trial, the police magistrate found that the intervenor had consented to the sale of the mortgaged property and entered judgment in plaintiff’s favor against the defendant and also the garnishees for $200. An appeal wras taken to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Great Western Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Shortridge v. SturdivantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Chaffee-Miller Land Co. v. BarberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Wisconsin Acceptance Co. v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. LaMunion v. Southern States Westminster Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API