Legal Opinion

Greeley & Loveland Irrigation Co. v. Farmers Pawnee Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 4, 1915No. 7562PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Logan District Court.—Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

On the merits, the question involved is whether the Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Company wrongfully impounded and held in its reservoir water which should have been permitted to flow down the stream, from which it was diverted, to supply the priorities of defendant in error, The latter brought an action against the irrigation company and certain water officials, the purpose of which was to compel the return of the stored water to the stream, and to restrain the commission of such alleged wrongful acts in the future. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff, and defendants have brought the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alamosa Creek Canal Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Petterson v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gunnison Irr. Co. v. Gunnison Highland Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Colorado State Board of Examiners of Architects v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Comstock v. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  5. Raymond v. HarrisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API