Kash v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 12 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— ■2 Met., 538; Kennedy ¿p Bro. vs. Cunningham. 2 Bibb-, 33; Maham vs. June. 3 J. J. Mar., 522; Ewing vs. Price. 1 Mar., 579; Haggin vs. Christian. 3 Bibb, 224; Mercer vs. Clark. 3 Bibb, 35; Bacon vs. Brown. 4 Dana, 81; Hargis vs. Price. 1 Bibb, 570; Price's adir vs. Cochran. 3 J. J. Mar., 420; Reid vs. Langford.
Read the full summary
CASE 12 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— ■2 Met., 538; Kennedy ¿p Bro. vs. Cunningham. 2 Bibb-, 33; Maham vs. June. 3 J. J. Mar., 522; Ewing vs. Price. 1 Mar., 579; Haggin vs. Christian. 3 Bibb, 224; Mercer vs. Clark. 3 Bibb, 35; Bacon vs. Brown. 4 Dana, 81; Hargis vs. Price. 1 Bibb, 570; Price's adir vs. Cochran. 3 J. J. Mar., 420; Reid vs. Langford. CITED— 2 Littell’s Laws of Ky., 96. Civil Code, sec. 657. 4 Dana, 168; Kercheval vs. Ambler. 5 B. M., 519; Waller vs. Logan. 2 J. J. Mar., 4; Talbott vs. Talbott. 5 Littell, 201; Haddix vs. Haddix. 4 Bibb, 194;…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion op the court:
On the question of identity in this action of replevin for a horse, the circuit court restricted the plaintiff, now appellant, to three witnesses, and would not permit him to examine more, though he offered to do so.
The legal restriction of the taxation of costs to three, witnesses to the same fact does not imply that a party shall examine only three, if he choose to do so at his own cost. »
On such a question as identity, which may be established by various circumstances — one witness testifying to one mark or sign, and other witnesses to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- North Jellico Coal Co. v. TrosperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Eaton v. Green River Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914