Legal Opinion

Mayzel v. Gould

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 2009No. 44,081-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeatross, J.

|, This case involves an alleged breach of a verbal agreement to sell and purchase a Hydro Axe 670 Fellerbuncher (“Shear”), which is a piece of logging equipment. The prospective purchaser, Mike Mayzel, sought and received a temporary restraining order prohibiting the owner of the Shear, Philip Gould, from alienating or disposing of the Shear following Mr. Gould’s refusal to go through with the sale. The TRO was subsequently dissolved by joint stipulation of the parties, with Mr. Gould reserving his right to seek damages at a later date. Mr. Mayzel then amended his petition to seek damages…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Lewis v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEV.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. Salvant v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  5. Orea v. ScallanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joyner v. LIPRIELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Young v. JoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. BARCAT, LLC v. NailLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Cindy Young v. Irvin T. JoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Joyner v. LIPRIELouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API