Legal Opinion

St. Louis Malleable Casting Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 5, 1931No. Docket No. 21659Published

Evidence held sufficient to sustain the affirmative allegations of the Commissioner as to depreciation sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

ST. LOUIS MALLEABLE CASTING COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

St. Louis Malleable Casting Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 21659.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

23 B.T.A. 1275; 1931 BTA LEXIS 1736;

August 5, 1931, Promulgated

Evidence held sufficient to sustain the affirmative allegations of the Commissioner as to depreciation sustained.

R. M. O'Hara, Esq., and Howard Kroehl, C.P.A., for the petitioner.

Miles J. O'Connor, Esq., and E. L. Updike, Esq., for the respondent.

SEAWELL

OPINION.

SEAWELL: This proceeding involves deficiencies in income tax as determined by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Metal Mfg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  2. St. Louis Mallaeable Casting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  3. Goodell-Pratt Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
  4. St. Louis Malleable Casting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API