Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Starbuck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The testator, Charles A. Starbuck, at the time of his death, owed the Empire Trust Company a large sum of money. Until the indebtedness is paid, the trust company refuses to consent to a transfer of twenty-six shares of capital stock of the trust company which the decedent owned at the time of his death, and it has retained and applied upon the indebtedness dividends declared upon the stock. The estate is insolvent. From the assets of the estate the unsecured creditors are entitled to a pro rata payment or dividend upon the sums due to them. The courts below have held that the executrix may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Strahmann v. Yorkville BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Globe Slicing MacHine Co., Inc., and Lewis Novoting v. Rolf K. Hasner, and Astrid SivertsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. In re the Accounting of HerrmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1948
  3. Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund v. Logic Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  4. Taylor's Administrator v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  5. Estate of Francis S. Tilyou by Florence J. Tilyou v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API