Legal Opinion
CASINO MOTOR COMPANY v. Needham
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 23, 1955Published
1Opinion of the Court
118 A.2d 781 (1955)
CASINO MOTOR COMPANY
v.
John H. NEEDHAM, Edward E. Ross, Richard W. Holmes, Warren V. Grindle and Clarence M. Page.
Substituted Respondents: Gerald J. Grady, Matthew McNeary, Leroy S. Nickerson, Dwight B. Demerritt and Vina P. Adams.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
November 23, 1955.
Michael Pilot, Bangor, for petitioner.
John H. Needham, Bangor, for respondent.
Before FELLOWS, C. J., and WILLIAMSON, WEBBER, BELIVEAU, TAPLEY and TIRRELL, JJ.
TAPLEY, Justice.
On exceptions. The Town of Orono, Maine, in 1933 enacted a zoning ordinance by authority of the provisions of R.S.1930, Ch. 5,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Webster v. BallouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.