Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Smith v. Stansbury

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 28, 1988No. B14-88-254-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

Relator seeks to direct Respondent to vacate his order denying her Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc and to enter such Judgment. The writ will not issue.

Relator complains of certain language in a Decree of Divorce signed on February 3, 1987 alleging that the inclusion of certain language was a clerical error which could and should be corrected by entry of Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc.

On December 29, 1986 Relator and her then husband, William Reed Smith, appeared with their respective counsel before Judge Stansbury seeking a divorce and division of their community…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Proffer v. YatesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nolan v. BettisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Partin v. De CordovaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API