Legal Opinion
Firm Amusement Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtTheodore B. Kupeermah, J.
This motion, brought on by order to show cause directing the defendant to make available a feature motion picture entitled “ Dirty Dingus McGee ” and enjoining exhibition at any other theatre in the New York Metropolitan area other than at Loew’s State Theatre No. 1, is denied.
Plaintiff is part of the Loew’s theatre chain, although it is a separate and distinct corporation. Prior to the decision in United States v. Paramount Pictures (334 U. S. 131), Loew’s Incorporated and the defendant Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (hereinafter MGM or Metro) were part of the same organization. Metro pictures…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Broadway Photoplay Co. v. . World Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Arnold Productions, Inc. v. Favorite Films Corporation, and Nationwide Television CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sable v. Sperry Gyroscope DivisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975