Legal Opinion
United States v. Metate Asbestos Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 10, 1984No. CIV-83-309-GLO-RMBPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BILBY, District Judge.
This is an action for injunctive relief and cost recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq., and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. Plaintiff United States and defendants Jack and Geraldine Neal, Jacqueline F. Querns, D.W. Jaquays Mining and Contractors Equipment Co., and Jaquays Mining Corp. have filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment on certain issues underlying the CERCLA claims.
The United…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- First Charter Financial Corp., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Mona Bell Azure, A/K/A Helen Marie Bell Azure v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by37 opinions
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- 3550 Stevens Creek Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Barclays Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.