Legal Opinion

Geron v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 2014PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Read, J.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has asked us two questions relating to “whether, for purposes of administering [a] . . . related bankruptcy, New York law treats a dissolved law firm’s pending hourly fee matters as its property” (In re Thelen LLP, 736 F3d 213, 216 [2d Cir 2013]). We hold that pending hourly fee matters are not partnership “property” or “unfinished business” within the meaning of New York’s Partnership Law. A law firm does not own a client or an engagement, and is only entitled to be paid for services actually rendered.

*23L

Thele…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Geron ex rel. Estate of Thelen LLP v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP (In re Thelen LLP)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Demov, Morris, Levin & Shein v. GlantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Barilli v. Sky Solar Holdings, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. LaFond v. SweeneySupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. Mitchell v. Lyons Professional Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Horner v. BagnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API