Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kaiser v. Ameritemps, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1999No. Nos. 97-2380 and 97-2510Published

1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.

For the reasons more fully set forth in my dissenting opinions in Robinson v. B.O.C. Group, Gen. Motors Corp. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 361, 371, 691 N.E.2d 667, 674, and Keller v. LTV Steel Co. (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d 55, 666 N.E.2d 225, I respectfully dissent.

Despite the majority’s reassurances, an employer is prejudiced by a claimant’s dismissal of the employer’s appeal. For an indeterminate period of time, the employee continues to receive what may prove to be unmerited payments of compensation or benefits. Although R.C. 4123.512(H) provides that adjustments may be made when final adjudication…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. B.O.C. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Keller v. LTV Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API