Legal Opinion
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Riverton Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 9, 1970No. 43, Docket 34718PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the district court’s determination that the patent of the appellee, Carter-Wallace, Inc., for a certain pharmaceutical compound, generically known as meprobamate, was valid, and, as the appellant, Riverton Laboratories, Inc., had conceded infringement, that Carter-Wallace was entitled to injunctive relief, an accounting and damages. 1 We affirm.
United States Letters Patent No. 2,724,720 was issued on November 22, 1955 to Carter Products, Inc., predecessor of Carter-Wallace, Inc., upon the application of Dr. Frank M. Berger and Dr. Bernard J.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Carl Peter KrimmelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Shields v. Halliburton Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Wilden Pump & Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Pressed & Welded Products Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.