Legal Opinion

Glick v. Hunter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. 23,582PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Bartholomew Circuit Court; Will M. Sparks, Special Judge. Election contest by Charles D. Glick against Charles G. Hunter. From a judgment for eontestee, the contestor appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, J.

— This was an action by the appellant to contest the election of appellee to the office of clerk of the Bartholomew Circuit Court. The only error assigned is the overruling of appellants’, motion for a new trial.

No special finding was asked nor made, and we can only conjecture as to which of the ballots introduced in evidence or concerning which evidence was offered were *53counted for the appellant, and which for the appellee, and which were rejected and not counted for either.

It is urged that the evidence does not sustain the finding. It appears that thirty-eight witnesses gave oral testimony,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bradley v. OnstottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Spaulding v. RomackIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Jones v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Robinson v. HornerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Board of Canvassers of Mingo Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bullington v. GrabowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  3. Dobbyn v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wright v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API