Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Department of Treasury

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 18, 1974No. 73 Civ. 3948 (IBC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, District Judge.

We have before us cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiffs and by co-defendant United States pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The material facts are not in dispute; summary judgment is therefore appropriate. At issue here are conflicting claims to a substantial amount of money now in the possession of co-defendant Property Clerk of the City of New York (hereinafter “Property Clerk”). For the reasons given below, we (1) grant the motion by the United States for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against it, and (2) dismiss the complaint against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Rena Falik v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
Astor-Honor, Inc. v. Grosset & Dunlap, Inc., and William F. Buckley, Jr., Bantam Books, Inc. And Arlington House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Harold McClendon v. Thomas E. Rosetti, Individually and as Police Property Clerk of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

Beresford Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
The State Bank of Fraser, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
Gordon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
Amwest Surety Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
Richard R. Dieckmann v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.