Legal Opinion

Disbarment Proceedings v. McNeese

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 2, 1940PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

Original action in disbarment. On information filed by the Bar Committee charging McNeese, an attorney at law, with conduct involving moral turpitude, Hon. Arch B. Davis of the Chillieothe Bar was appointed special commissioner. He performed his duties as such by reporting his finding of facts and conclusions of law. The commissioner recommended the disbarment of McNeese.

Exceptions to the report were filed by McNeese. The exceptions may be reduced to a contention that said conduct of McNeese did not involve moral turpitude.

In this court McNeese filed no brief. Furthermore, we were not favored…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  2. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Wolfe's DisbarmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Matter of Application of ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. In re GottesfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Neibling v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. In Re FrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Gholston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API