Legal Opinion
Cacciato v. Leatherman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.
The plaintiffs, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries and damage to property, move for summary judgment on the issue of liability and for an assessment of damages. The defendants cross-move for an order directing the injured plaintiff to be physically examined “ by doctors of defendants’ choice.”
*551At about 1:00 a.m. of October 2, 1957, the plaintiff Carl Caceiato was stopped while operating his wife’s automobile on Main Street and Northern Boulevard, Flushing, Queens, awaiting a change of a traffic light located at that intersection. He was struck in the- rear by a truck tractor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Taylor v. African Methodist Episcopal ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Schner v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Wolfe v. Madison Avenue Coach Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nabozny v. HamilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960